Thinksy EngineeringEngineer usage detail
FY2027 · Feb 2026 – Jan 2027Data through Oct 2026
← Engineering Effectiveness report
Agent Platform · Robin Silva

Riley

Engineer · AI usage, harness practices and where spend could have gone further.

Demonstration report. This engineer and their usage are synthetic.

This page is for the engineer and their manager to find cheaper defaults and harness fixes. It is never used to rank people.

Period
01

Summary

FY2027 to date

AI spend
$3,254
184 sessions · $18 each
Savings opportunity
$966
30% of spend, at list price
Practices on target
4 of 7
Focus: rtk coverage, Cache hit rate
Cache hit rate
77%
Team 84% · org 82%
02

Where spend could go further

FY2027 to date · estimated at list price

Savings opportunity by lever

$966 of $3,254 spend

Improve prompt caching$664Right-size models$177Keep context lean$114Route commands through rtk$11

What to change

Largest saving first

  1. Improve prompt caching$664

    Cache hit rate 77% against an 85% target.

    Keep stable context at the front of prompts and avoid switching models mid-session, so 85% of input reads from cache.

  2. Right-size models$177

    31% of routine spend ran on Opus: code research $146 of $487, documentation $130 of $383, ops $129 of $424, presentation $30 of $92.

    Run docs, decks, ops and read-only research on Sonnet instead of Opus.

  3. Keep context lean$114

    10% of input tokens were past 100K of context.

    Compact or /clear between tasks instead of carrying more than 100K tokens of context.

  4. Route commands through rtk$11

    77% of 1,812 Bash calls ran through rtk; 2.7M tokens of command output went into context.

    rtk compacts test, build, git and search output before it reaches the model (about 70% smaller).

03

Harness practices

Compared with Agent Platform and the organization

PracticeRileyTeamOrgTargetRecommendation
rtk coverage77%Needs attention74%56%≥ 80% of Bash callsInstall the rtk hook so test, build, git and search commands return compact output.
Knowledge MCP use
11 findings saved back
50%On target48%30%≥ 40% of sessionsOn target
Cache hit rate77%Needs attention84%82%≥ 85% of inputKeep CLAUDE.md and tool lists stable, avoid mid-session model switches, and resume sessions instead of restarting.
Context past 100K10%On target6%10%≤ 10% of inputOn target
Opus on routine work31%Needs attention29%44%≤ 25% of routine spendDefault routine sessions to Sonnet and keep Opus for harness, design and hard debugging work.
Sessions using subagents59%On target59%50%≥ 30% of sessionsOn target
Tool error rate2.8%On target2.5%3.0%≤ 4% of tool callsOn target

Practices by month

Is the engineer moving toward the targets?

MonthrtkKnowledgeCacheContextModel fitSubagentsSavings opportunity
Feb 2026––62%Off target10%On target42%Needs attention42%On target$127
Mar 2026––61%Off target9%On target42%Needs attention29%Needs attention$121
Apr 2026––64%Off target9%On target42%Needs attention47%On target$161
May 202628%Off target–68%Off target9%On target37%Needs attention42%On target$221
Jun 202655%Needs attention24%Needs attention75%Needs attention10%Needs attention36%Needs attention50%On target$114
Jul 202683%On target38%Needs attention75%Needs attention7%On target26%Needs attention47%On target$72
Aug 202690%On target59%On target79%Needs attention10%Needs attention25%On target75%On target$105
Sep 202689%On target60%On target88%On target10%On target19%On target67%On target$18
Oct 202682%On target56%On target85%On target10%On target16%On target74%On target$27
04

Usage

FY2027 to date

AI spend by model

By model tier, by month

  • Opus
  • Sonnet
  • Haiku
  • Other
$0$200$400$600$260Feb$266Mar$372Apr$540May$410Jun$280Jul$484Aug$257Sep$386Oct

AI spend by session type

Routine types (documentation, presentation, ops, code research) rarely need Opus

Harness$1,298Freeform$434Code research$487Documentation$383Ideation$136Ops$424Presentation$92

Tokens by model

Cache reads are billed at a fraction of uncached input; a high share is what good caching looks like

ModelRequestsUncached inputCache readsCache writesOutputSpend
Opus 5.51,8779.1M93.6M6.6M2.3M$134
Opus 52,37517.6M113.4M8.4M3M$273
Opus 4.82,17823.4M93.6M7.5M2.9M$283
Opus 4.64,61271.9M164.4M15.1M6.4M$696
Opus 4.52414.2M8.1M787K351K$39
Sonnet 5.55,18329.1M288.3M20.3M7.7M$214
Sonnet 58,82159.8M382.2M28.2M10.9M$564
Sonnet 4.68,347126.6M337M29.6M12.3M$776
Sonnet 4.565014M26.8M2.6M1.2M$78
Haiku 5.56,82439.3M377.6M26.6M12.6M$17
Haiku 4.56,36470.2M282.3M22.5M9.2M$172
GPT Realtime (meetings)80986K3.2M269K115K$8
Total47,552466.2M2170.7M168.3M68.9M$3,254

Methodology

  • Spend and tokens come from LiteLLM gateway logs and imported agent session history, priced at API list rates.
  • Savings are estimates: routine Opus work repriced at the Sonnet available at the time; uncached input moved to cache reads up to an 85% hit rate; rtk removing 70% of unfiltered command output, which stays in context for about half the session's remaining turns; and 50% of input past 100K context avoided by compacting. Levers overlap, so the total is an upper bound.
  • rtk and the knowledge MCP are scored from their rollout (rtk May 2026, knowledge MCP Jun 2026).
  • Generated Oct 20, 2026, 7:46 AM.
Engineer Usage Detail (demo) · Thomas Tucker