Thinksy EngineeringEngineer usage detail
FY2027 · Feb 2026 – Jan 2027Data through Oct 2026
← Engineering Effectiveness report
Agent Platform · Robin Silva

Rowan

Engineer · AI usage, harness practices and where spend could have gone further.

Demonstration report. This engineer and their usage are synthetic.

This page is for the engineer and their manager to find cheaper defaults and harness fixes. It is never used to rank people.

Period
01

Summary

FY2027 to date

AI spend
$2,360
159 sessions · $15 each
Savings opportunity
$515
22% of spend, at list price
Practices on target
4 of 7
Focus: rtk coverage, Knowledge MCP use
Cache hit rate
85%
Team 84% · org 82%
02

Where spend could go further

FY2027 to date · estimated at list price

Savings opportunity by lever

$515 of $2,360 spend

Improve prompt caching$270Right-size models$164Keep context lean$64Route commands through rtk$17

What to change

Largest saving first

  1. Improve prompt caching$270

    Cache hit rate 85% against an 85% target.

    Keep stable context at the front of prompts and avoid switching models mid-session, so 85% of input reads from cache.

  2. Right-size models$164

    40% of routine spend ran on Opus: code research $136 of $355, documentation $78 of $187, ops $146 of $357, presentation $33 of $75.

    Run docs, decks, ops and read-only research on Sonnet instead of Opus.

  3. Keep context lean$64

    8% of input tokens were past 100K of context.

    Compact or /clear between tasks instead of carrying more than 100K tokens of context.

  4. Route commands through rtk$17

    66% of 1,788 Bash calls ran through rtk; 2.6M tokens of command output went into context.

    rtk compacts test, build, git and search output before it reaches the model (about 70% smaller).

03

Harness practices

Compared with Agent Platform and the organization

PracticeRowanTeamOrgTargetRecommendation
rtk coverage66%Needs attention74%56%≥ 80% of Bash callsInstall the rtk hook so test, build, git and search commands return compact output.
Knowledge MCP use
6 findings saved back
31%Needs attention48%30%≥ 40% of sessionsSearch the knowledge MCP before re-researching a codebase, and save findings back with remember.
Cache hit rate85%On target84%82%≥ 85% of inputOn target
Context past 100K8%On target6%10%≤ 10% of inputOn target
Opus on routine work40%Needs attention29%44%≤ 25% of routine spendDefault routine sessions to Sonnet and keep Opus for harness, design and hard debugging work.
Sessions using subagents61%On target59%50%≥ 30% of sessionsOn target
Tool error rate2.2%On target2.5%3.0%≤ 4% of tool callsOn target

Practices by month

Is the engineer moving toward the targets?

MonthrtkKnowledgeCacheContextModel fitSubagentsSavings opportunity
Feb 2026––61%Off target9%On target62%Off target39%On target$35
Mar 2026––62%Off target8%On target62%Off target47%On target$34
Apr 2026––65%Off target9%On target62%Off target34%On target$57
May 202626%Off target–69%Off target8%On target55%Off target42%On target$73
Jun 202647%Needs attention15%Needs attention77%Needs attention8%On target53%Off target69%On target$82
Jul 202672%Needs attention27%Needs attention77%Needs attention8%On target40%Needs attention41%On target$71
Aug 202673%Needs attention32%Needs attention82%Needs attention10%On target38%Needs attention53%On target$83
Sep 202674%Needs attention37%Needs attention82%Needs attention7%On target30%Needs attention60%On target$34
Oct 202669%Needs attention35%Needs attention91%On target7%On target27%Needs attention77%On target$46
04

Usage

FY2027 to date

AI spend by model

By model tier, by month

  • Opus
  • Sonnet
  • Haiku
  • Other
$0$200$400$600$800$62Feb$79Mar$115Apr$178May$321Jun$246Jul$493Aug$217Sep$651Oct

AI spend by session type

Routine types (documentation, presentation, ops, code research) rarely need Opus

Harness$958Freeform$296Code research$355Documentation$187Ideation$133Ops$357Presentation$75

Tokens by model

Cache reads are billed at a fraction of uncached input; a high share is what good caching looks like

ModelRequestsUncached inputCache readsCache writesOutputSpend
Opus 5.55,12010.4M246.3M16.4M7.8M$328
Opus 54,11523.5M172M12.5M4.7M$398
Opus 4.82,65624.4M112.8M8.8M3.7M$326
Opus 4.62,05032.5M82.6M7.4M3.3M$332
Opus 4.5801.4M2.7M260K116K$13
Sonnet 5.57,59715.6M408.9M27.1M11.3M$253
Sonnet 55,75739.2M277.4M20.2M8.2M$399
Sonnet 4.62,19627.5M91.1M7.6M3M$183
Sonnet 4.51072.1M3.9M379K150K$11
Haiku 5.511,52122.6M642.4M42.4M14.6M$21
Haiku 4.53,55228.1M174.4M12.9M5.3M$88
GPT Realtime (meetings)99693K4.5M334K128K$8
Total44,850227.7M2219M156.2M62.3M$2,360

Methodology

  • Spend and tokens come from LiteLLM gateway logs and imported agent session history, priced at API list rates.
  • Savings are estimates: routine Opus work repriced at the Sonnet available at the time; uncached input moved to cache reads up to an 85% hit rate; rtk removing 70% of unfiltered command output, which stays in context for about half the session's remaining turns; and 50% of input past 100K context avoided by compacting. Levers overlap, so the total is an upper bound.
  • rtk and the knowledge MCP are scored from their rollout (rtk May 2026, knowledge MCP Jun 2026).
  • Generated Oct 20, 2026, 7:46 AM.
Engineer Usage Detail (demo) · Thomas Tucker