Thinksy EngineeringEngineer usage detail
FY2027 · Feb 2026 – Jan 2027Data through Oct 2026
← Engineering Effectiveness report
Infrastructure · Robin Silva

Sage

Lead engineer · AI usage, harness practices and where spend could have gone further.

Demonstration report. This engineer and their usage are synthetic.

This page is for the engineer and their manager to find cheaper defaults and harness fixes. It is never used to rank people.

Period
01

Summary

FY2027 to date

AI spend
$3,057
205 sessions · $15 each
Savings opportunity
$357
12% of spend, at list price
Practices on target
6 of 7
Focus: rtk coverage
Cache hit rate
88%
Team 84% · org 82%
02

Where spend could go further

FY2027 to date · estimated at list price

Savings opportunity by lever

$357 of $3,057 spend

Improve prompt caching$164Right-size models$134Keep context lean$48Route commands through rtk$10

What to change

Largest saving first

  1. Improve prompt caching$164

    Cache hit rate 88% against an 85% target.

    Keep stable context at the front of prompts and avoid switching models mid-session, so 85% of input reads from cache.

  2. Right-size models$134

    21% of routine spend ran on Opus: code research $113 of $552, documentation $35 of $170, ops $176 of $845, presentation $5 of $33.

    Run docs, decks, ops and read-only research on Sonnet instead of Opus.

  3. Keep context lean$48

    4% of input tokens were past 100K of context.

    Compact or /clear between tasks instead of carrying more than 100K tokens of context.

  4. Route commands through rtk$10

    77% of 2,105 Bash calls ran through rtk; 2.8M tokens of command output went into context.

    rtk compacts test, build, git and search output before it reaches the model (about 70% smaller).

03

Harness practices

Compared with Infrastructure and the organization

PracticeSageTeamOrgTargetRecommendation
rtk coverage77%Needs attention69%56%≥ 80% of Bash callsInstall the rtk hook so test, build, git and search commands return compact output.
Knowledge MCP use
15 findings saved back
51%On target37%30%≥ 40% of sessionsOn target
Cache hit rate88%On target84%82%≥ 85% of inputOn target
Context past 100K4%On target6%10%≤ 10% of inputOn target
Opus on routine work21%On target33%44%≤ 25% of routine spendOn target
Sessions using subagents53%On target51%50%≥ 30% of sessionsOn target
Tool error rate2.9%On target3.1%3.0%≤ 4% of tool callsOn target

Practices by month

Is the engineer moving toward the targets?

MonthrtkKnowledgeCacheContextModel fitSubagentsSavings opportunity
Feb 2026––66%Off target3%On target30%Needs attention37%On target$54
Mar 2026––68%Off target6%On target30%Needs attention40%On target$45
Apr 2026––72%Needs attention2%On target30%Needs attention34%On target$78
May 202630%Off target–82%Needs attention6%On target26%Needs attention47%On target$56
Jun 202655%Needs attention23%Needs attention86%On target6%On target26%Needs attention36%On target$39
Jul 202688%On target41%On target88%On target4%On target19%On target53%On target$18
Aug 202694%On target63%On target88%On target6%On target17%On target61%On target$34
Sep 202695%On target61%On target93%On target6%On target13%On target62%On target$17
Oct 202685%On target63%On target93%On target3%On target11%On target69%On target$16
04

Usage

FY2027 to date

AI spend by model

By model tier, by month

  • Opus
  • Sonnet
  • Haiku
  • Other
$0$200$400$600$139Feb$129Mar$243Apr$389May$448Jun$320Jul$552Aug$333Sep$503Oct

AI spend by session type

Routine types (documentation, presentation, ops, code research) rarely need Opus

Harness$882Freeform$483Code research$552Documentation$170Ideation$93Ops$845Presentation$33

Tokens by model

Cache reads are billed at a fraction of uncached input; a high share is what good caching looks like

ModelRequestsUncached inputCache readsCache writesOutputSpend
Opus 5.51,9601.3M118.4M7.6M2.8M$123
Opus 52,1915.4M109.1M7.3M3.2M$207
Opus 4.82,1008.4M100.5M6.9M2.6M$201
Opus 4.62,41424M106.3M8.3M3.7M$317
Opus 4.51071.5M3.6M328K142K$15
Sonnet 5.510,8616.2M563.3M36.4M16.2M$321
Sonnet 513,96035M744.1M49.7M19.2M$803
Sonnet 4.610,40281.8M498.6M37M15.9M$772
Sonnet 4.56029.1M21.5M2M784K$53
Haiku 5.512,3797.6M703.2M45.4M16.9M$22
Haiku 4.511,34546.9M529.7M36.8M14.2M$217
GPT Realtime (meetings)74284K3.8M262K116K$6
Total68,395227.6M3502.1M238.1M95.7M$3,057

Methodology

  • Spend and tokens come from LiteLLM gateway logs and imported agent session history, priced at API list rates.
  • Savings are estimates: routine Opus work repriced at the Sonnet available at the time; uncached input moved to cache reads up to an 85% hit rate; rtk removing 70% of unfiltered command output, which stays in context for about half the session's remaining turns; and 50% of input past 100K context avoided by compacting. Levers overlap, so the total is an upper bound.
  • rtk and the knowledge MCP are scored from their rollout (rtk May 2026, knowledge MCP Jun 2026).
  • Generated Oct 20, 2026, 7:46 AM.
Engineer Usage Detail (demo) · Thomas Tucker